ALL material protected by copyright laws. No unauthorized use. All material protected as it is ALL original.

The Big Flaw - Cosmology rewritten

Scott L Lineback

My Chunky cosmology answers many questions about the Big Bang or expansion models while delivering a range of masses that will satisfy JWST, Planck and SDSS observations with a range of initial chunks.

Our current cosmology relies on several unwarranted assumptions that only complicate the entire equation. They are: 1) that a singularity ever existed 2) that the singularity IF it existed was homogenous in composition 3)that it MUST have had a start 4) that a singularity would be more likely than a preformed universe complete with galaxies 5) that physics changed for some unknown reason 300 million years post bang 6) Inflations Magic Fix 7) Dark Energy's Handwave 8) Symmetry Fetish 9) Slow SMBH Growth.

I must have been the only one that liked explosions. I noticed that I had NEVER seen an explosion that distributed mass and energy equally. While they were doing all this crazy math to try to substantiate a Big Bang they left common sense behind and forgot that Spacetime can't be separated. They MUST commit. Either space and time are part of ONE thing or it isn't. If they are part of the same thing, Spacetime; then to talk about a time before space is meaningless. If they aren't part of one whole then the Big Bang is possible, but almost everything else that cosmologists accept would have to be rejected.

The current model fails colossally due to ONE unwarranted assumption; that there was a time before space or matter before time.

Space, Time, Matter and Motion are fundamentally linked in such a way that the current model which starts with T = 0 is invalid. There can be NO time without space. No space without time. Matter cannot exist in any place EXCEPT SPACE. Space is a meaningless concept without matter. What is distance without two points? How could space even be said to exist without matter to occupy it? More fundamentally how could the singularity ever occur without space or time? Where was the matter before space and time? It is a nonsense proposal.

IF Einstein is right and Time and space are two parts of a whole then it is IMPOSSIBLE for their to be a time without space or a space without time. Talk of T = 0 makes ZERO sense. if there was no time then how could ANYTHING happen? if there was no space then where could it happen? Real scientists scoffed at spontaneous generation of flies and 300 years later Einstain supersized the flies and called them a universe. Seriously? NO ONE SAW THIS?

Search for a first cause leads us to an inevitable regress which eventually leads us to the inescapable conclusion that AT LEAST ONE THING HAPPENED UNCAUSED.

This totally destroys the need for a "Big Bang." Why should a singularity "springing into existence" or "always existing" be any more logically necessary than the universe "springing into existence in it's current form" or "always existing in a form like the current one?" I can think of none.

BUT if we want to cling to the singularity backbone my theory STILL explains current empirical observations better than the ΛCDM does. In fact it gets us to the current state of the universe better than any explanation extant, including simple big bang, simple inflation, the cyclic bang and cyclic expansion.

My theory is this: IF there was a singularity or more than one singularity then the initial bang OR inflation was NOT uniform. Not all primordial matter was blasted into subatomic particles. Some super massive chunks remained with the subatomic soup. These supermassive chunks of primordial matter were spewed into space during the bang/rebang or inflation/reinflation.

Their presence formed supermassive black holes which hold the universe together. It also explains the unpredictable trajectories and red shift readings we see. There was no uniformly distributed subatomic soup. There were chunks. Uniformity was a majority not a totality.

How? There are many ways to get here. Lets start with our big bang or inflation model spewing matter haphazardly, not uniformly. Why? It is the nature of REAL explosions from match head to supernova proportions. Things do not explode into equally sized equally distributed chunks ANYWHERE ELSE we have observed. Why would the "Big Bang", if there was one, be an exception to this rule?

This could occur for many different reasons, including 1) an "off center" explosion 2) the force of the explosion compressing matter on the outer edge of the singularity at a different rate than that closer to the initial explosion event 3) the original singularity was NOT uniform in mass, some parts of the singularity were magnitudes denser than others. The lambda model ASSUMES all of these things and then does some fancy math to try to prove it. My theory doesn't rest on any assumptions at all, only logic and observable data.

My claim that the ΛCDM Universe was NOT the correct model has been proven by my "Bang with chunks" model. It also removes the need for physics to change for no apparent reason 300 million years post bang. Our physicists have been scamming the government since they called Oppenheimer and forced himn out, amazingly around the same time fusion was mastered.

3. Data Validation

3.1 CMB and Peak Spacing Redshift: z ~ 1100—zg∼700z_g \sim 700z_g \sim 700, zflux∼400z_{flux} \sim 400z_{flux} \sim 400.

Peaks: Seed mass (10⁶–10¹² M⊙\text{M}_\odot\text{M}_\odot) sets rd∼135–160 Mpcr_d \sim 135–160 \, \text{Mpc}r_d \sim 135–160 \, \text{Mpc}, yielding ℓ∼200–240\ell \sim 200–240\ell \sim 200–240, Δℓ∼100\Delta \ell \sim 100\Delta \ell \sim 100 —distinct from standard harmonics.

3.2 Redshift and Hubble Parameter: DESI: z ~ 0.1–4, H(z)∼80–200 km/s/MpcH(z) \sim 80–200 \, \text{km/s/Mpc}H(z) \sim 80–200 \, \text{km/s/Mpc} —matches within 1–3% precision.

3.3 BAO Evolution: Size Flux: rd∼147–150 Mpcr_d \sim 147–150 \, \text{Mpc}r_d \sim 147–150 \, \text{Mpc} —aligns with DESI’s 1–3% shift.

4. Implications This model eliminates horizon, SMBH, and dark energy timing issues with one tweak, predicting CMB peak spacing (Δℓ∼100\Delta \ell \sim 100\Delta \ell \sim 100)

as a seed-mass signature—testable via future CMB and gravitational wave data.

5. Conclusion

The Chunky Cosmology offers a variable-driven cosmology, resolving key challenges while matching observations with minimal adjustment, redefining cosmic evolution through

SMBH dynamics.

Next: The REAL filled in picture. I give you ALL the mechanics for the universe. I am waiting NASA. I will disprove ALL of the following laws next.