How the Theory of Relativity Has Led to the Breakdown of Western Society

When I started researching for empiric data to support the UFL, I started at the basics. I started with gravity. I started there because it has always offended me when people make "universal" or absolute statements based on very small sample sizes.

I had read that gravity was constant, but I remembered that local gravity maps on Earth contradicted that. I saw that the "universal" had to be patched. Newton's lengthy travels around the vast expanse of England had been insufficient to define gravity.

I also noted that gravity was tied with mass and matter in a self-referential loop in which none of the metrics were properly defined. They didn't even provide a definition for mass.

I thought, "OK, let's try the other part of E = mc²." I looked at the definition of light. I was equally stunned to discover that the "speed of light" was a quantity that was unproven in a place that doesn't exist. Even by the SM's own admission, the universe isn't a total vacuum. Furthermore, how can anyone who calls themselves a responsible scientist extrapolate a universal speed, once again from our infinitesimally tiny section of the universe?

I thought, "Well, this has been accepted since before I was born, so maybe I am missing something. I will apply logic to their theories and ignore the math." That is when physics became the funniest thing I had ever read.

I thought about what the gravity formula meant if it was applied. It meant that if I go to space and I am "weightless," then I have no "mass." If I have no mass, then I have no matter either. So according to the SM, I transform into a ghost, an energy being, or I cease to exist once I leave Earth's gravity.

I am pretty sure that is wrong, meaning the formula is wrong.

The first 30-40 fallacies they committed, I got angrier and angrier. Then I read enough of their "theories" that reading them became incredibly hysterical. I love the extremely flexible rules that have infested physics. All A are B ... except when they are C ... or maybe X ... unless it is a galactic leap year and then you have to take the third Thursday until you hit the 4th dimension and get off in Hyperborea.

The theory of relativity split the realm of science into mysticism. The "geniuses" told everyone that "reality is subjective" and "it depends on your point of view." NO, IT DOESN'T. There is only one truth. It isn't "my truth" or "your truth" or even "our truth." THE TRUTH is only one thing.

This mindset has eventually allowed us to view human fetuses as the cat in Schrödinger's box. The fetus is either alive or unalive, depending on your point of view. People spent their lives living or searching for "my truth" instead of joining ALL of us in determining THE TRUTH and it has splintered the western world.

The law of identity violations allowed us to blame guns for the actions of people and equate trans women to women. The very fact that the designations are different prove they are not the same. Science has now become a game of semantics instead of a search for the truth.

The search for Truth was the purpose of science, until it was hijacked by theoretical math that can't prove anything.

Relativity makes the laws of nature "observer-dependent," like physics is a choose-your-own-adventure book or a game of Calvinball. It may, or may not, have mass, in a relativistic way. It may, or may not, stop and hang out with other particles, in a relativistic way. It might see its own role in the universe in a relativistic way.

There is nothing any being or object can do to alter the progression of the universe, and thus the flow of time. The universe doesn't care how stoned the observer is or how fast he can imagine going. It doesn't care about how symmetric it is. The universe runs on U.S.T., Universe Standard Time, and it is ALWAYS "now o'clock."

Time dilation ... is that what happens before the cosmic mother gives birth? Or what happens to the universe's eyes when it has too much relativity to drink?

I daresay that "virtual" particles could do "virtually" anything. How can no one see that this is a blatant violation of the law of identity?